Workshop on Cretaceous Climate and Ocean Dynamics

July 14-17, 2002

Florissant, Colorado, USA

Title:

The Cretaceous Carbon Cycle: Interpreting the Carbon Isotope Record

Author:Michael A Arthur
Date Submitted:05/02/2002
Address:Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University
University Park,
PA
USA
16802
Phone:(814) 863-6054
Email:arthur@geosc.psu.edu
Co-Authors:
Affiliation:Pennsylvania State University
  
Abstract URL:http://cis.whoi.edu/science/GG/ccod/viewAbstracts.cfm?RefNumber=19725622
Keywords:carbon isotopes, OAE, carbon cycle, organic carbon burial
Abstract:Variations in the carbon isotopic compositions of marine carbonate and organic carbon provide a record of changes in the fraction of organic carbon buried through time and may provide clues to changes in rates of weathering, sources of organic carbon, and possibly changes in carbon fluxes from volcanism and gas hydrate decomposition events. Paired carbonate and organic carbon isotope determinations provide a possibility of interpreting not only changes in global carbon cycling, but changes in atmospheric pCO2 as well. Interpretations of these types of data are typically rather qualitative, for example, the common assertion that a positive carbon isotope excursion indicates an increase in the rate of burial of organic carbon.

A quantitative approach to carbon cycle modeling provides some surprising insights, some of them counterintuitive. For this purpose, I employ a simple model of the global carbon cycle which is subjected to a number of different perturbations on scales and magnitudes appropriate to the Cretaceous. In addition to standard considerations of carbon mass and isotopic fluxes to the ocean-atmosphere system from weathering and volcanism and fluxes of organic carbon and carbonate-carbon to sediments, the model incorporates sensitivity of the photosynthetic carbon isotope effect to changes in pCO2 . The inclusion of this parameter leads to unexpected carbon isotope responses to forcing that causes increased rates of organic carbon burial. I will compare the model simulated carbon isotopic responses for several experiments to paired carbonate- and organic-carbon records to illustrate how these records might be interpreted in light of the model response. In particular, I will focus on characteristics of the Aptian OAE 1a event and demonstrate the diffences in system response to various volcanic forcing scenarios as opposed to that produced by a large release of methane from gas hydrates. The results of carbon cycle modeling suggest that gas hydrate release cannot be the primary cause of the OAE and carbon isotope variations, whereas a "superplume" event appears to best produce the responses seen in the sedimentary and geochemical record. Carbon cycle modeling suggests that the Cenomanian-Turonian (OAE 2) event is not clearly related to either increased volcanic carbon dioxide degassing or to methane clathrate release.