| Abstract: | Variations in the carbon isotopic compositions of
marine carbonate and organic carbon provide a record
of changes in the fraction of organic carbon buried
through time and may provide clues to changes in rates
of weathering, sources of organic carbon, and possibly
changes in carbon fluxes from volcanism and gas
hydrate decomposition events. Paired carbonate and
organic carbon isotope determinations provide a
possibility of interpreting not only changes in global
carbon cycling, but changes in atmospheric
pCO2 as well. Interpretations of these
types of data are typically rather qualitative, for example,
the common assertion that a positive carbon isotope
excursion indicates an increase in the rate of burial of
organic carbon.
A quantitative approach to carbon cycle modeling
provides some surprising insights, some of them
counterintuitive. For this purpose, I employ a simple
model of the global carbon cycle which is subjected to
a number of different perturbations on scales and
magnitudes appropriate to the Cretaceous. In addition
to standard considerations of carbon mass and
isotopic fluxes to the ocean-atmosphere system from
weathering and volcanism and fluxes of organic carbon
and carbonate-carbon to sediments, the model
incorporates sensitivity of the photosynthetic carbon
isotope effect to changes in pCO2 . The
inclusion of this parameter leads to unexpected carbon
isotope responses to forcing that causes increased
rates of organic carbon burial. I will compare the model
simulated carbon isotopic responses for several
experiments to paired carbonate- and organic-carbon
records to illustrate how these records might be
interpreted in light of the model response.
In particular, I will focus on characteristics of the Aptian
OAE 1a event and demonstrate the diffences in system
response to various volcanic forcing scenarios as
opposed to that produced by a large release of
methane from gas hydrates. The results of carbon
cycle modeling suggest that gas hydrate release
cannot be the primary cause of the OAE and carbon
isotope variations, whereas a "superplume" event
appears to best produce the responses seen in the
sedimentary and geochemical record. Carbon cycle
modeling suggests that the Cenomanian-Turonian
(OAE 2) event is not clearly related to either increased
volcanic carbon dioxide degassing or to methane
clathrate release. |